{
  "batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
  "articles": [
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_anchor_163_472",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon Revised Statutes: ORS 163.472 heading (anchor)",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] The Oregon Legislature's official ORS HTML publishes ORS 163.472 under the heading quoted.",
      "body": "The Oregon Legislature's official ORS HTML publishes ORS 163.472 under the heading quoted.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“163.472 Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image”\n\nNote: Anchor record: legislature's own statute site, state .gov domain.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "163.472 Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon Revised Statutes",
      "topic": "ORS 163.472 heading (anchor)",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_off",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(1)-(2): with intent to harass, humiliate or injure, knowingly disclosing an intimate image without consent, causing harassment, humiliation or injury, is a Class A misdemeanor (Class C felony after a prior conviction).",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(1)-(2): with intent to harass, humiliate or injure, knowingly disclosing an intimate image without consent, causing harassment, humiliation or injury, is a Class A misdemeanor (Class C felony after a prior conviction).\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“The person, with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly causes to be disclosed an image of the other person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct; (b) The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure. (2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class A misdemeanor. (b) Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class C felony if the person has a prior conviction under this section at the time of the offense.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "The person, with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly causes to be disclosed an image of the other person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct; (b) The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure. (2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class A misdemeanor. (b) Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class C felony if the person has a prior conviction under this section at the time of the offense.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_elem",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Elements: knowledge and reasonable person",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(1)(b)-(d): the person knew or should have known there was no consent, the other person is harassed, humiliated or injured, and a reasonable person would be.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(1)(b)-(d): the person knew or should have known there was no consent, the other person is harassed, humiliated or injured, and a reasonable person would be.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Elements: knowledge and reasonable person",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_deep",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Deepfakes: reasonably realistic altered images",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B): an 'image' includes a digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B): an 'image' includes a digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“A digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "A digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Deepfakes: reasonably realistic altered images",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_disc",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Disclose defined",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(3)(a): disclose includes transfer, publish, distribute, exhibit, advertise and offer.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(3)(a): disclose includes transfer, publish, distribute, exhibit, advertise and offer.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“Disclose includes, but is not limited to, transfer, publish, distribute, exhibit, advertise and offer.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "Disclose includes, but is not limited to, transfer, publish, distribute, exhibit, advertise and offer.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Disclose defined",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_parts",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Intimate parts defined",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(3)(e): intimate parts means uncovered human genitals, pubic areas or female nipples.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(3)(e): intimate parts means uncovered human genitals, pubic areas or female nipples.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“Intimate parts means uncovered human genitals, pubic areas or female nipples.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "Intimate parts means uncovered human genitals, pubic areas or female nipples.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Intimate parts defined",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_commercial",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Exception: images created for a commercial purpose with consent",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(4)(f)(B): the section does not apply to images originally created for a commercial purpose with the consent of the other person.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(4)(f)(B): the section does not apply to images originally created for a commercial purpose with the consent of the other person.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“Originally created for a commercial purpose with the consent of the other person;”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "Originally created for a commercial purpose with the consent of the other person;",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Exception: images created for a commercial purpose with consent",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_plat",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Exception: interactive computer service providers",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(4)(g): the section does not apply to the provider of an interactive computer service for an image of intimate parts provided by an information content provider.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(4)(g): the section does not apply to the provider of an interactive computer service for an image of intimate parts provided by an information content provider.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“The provider of an interactive computer service for an image of intimate parts provided by an information content provider.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "The provider of an interactive computer service for an image of intimate parts provided by an information content provider.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Exception: interactive computer service providers",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_pub",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472: Exceptions: public interest and voluntary public display",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.472(4)(e), (f)(A): lawful public interest disclosures and images of a person voluntarily displaying intimate parts in a public area are excepted.",
      "body": "ORS 163.472(4)(e), (f)(A): lawful public interest disclosures and images of a person voluntarily displaying intimate parts in a public area are excepted.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“Disclosures that serve a lawful public interest; (f) Disclosures of images: (A) Depicting the other person voluntarily displaying, in a public area, the other persons intimate parts or engaging in sexual conduct;”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "Disclosures that serve a lawful public interest; (f) Disclosures of images: (A) Depicting the other person voluntarily displaying, in a public area, the other persons intimate parts or engaging in sexual conduct;",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.472",
      "topic": "Exceptions: public interest and voluntary public display",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_civil",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 30.835: Civil action for improper disclosure of private information",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 30.835(2): a cause of action for disclosing personal information (home address, phone, children's photographs and so on) with intent to stalk, harass or injure; remedies include damages, punitive damages, injunction and attorney fees.",
      "body": "ORS 30.835(2): a cause of action for disclosing personal information (home address, phone, children's photographs and so on) with intent to stalk, harass or injure; remedies include damages, punitive damages, injunction and attorney fees.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“A plaintiff has a cause of action for improper disclosure of private information if the plaintiff establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) The defendant, with the intent to stalk, harass or injure the plaintiff, knowingly caused personal information to be disclosed; (b) The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the plaintiff did not consent to the disclosure; (c) The plaintiff is stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure.”\n\nNote: Covers personal information, not intimate images.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "A plaintiff has a cause of action for improper disclosure of private information if the plaintiff establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) The defendant, with the intent to stalk, harass or injure the plaintiff, knowingly caused personal information to be disclosed; (b) The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the plaintiff did not consent to the disclosure; (c) The plaintiff is stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 30.835",
      "topic": "Civil action for improper disclosure of private information",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_limit",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 30.835: Civil action time limit",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 30.835(4): the action must be commenced within two years after the conduct occurred.",
      "body": "ORS 30.835(4): the action must be commenced within two years after the conduct occurred.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“An action under this section must be commenced not later than two years after the conduct that gives rise to a claim for relief occurred.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "An action under this section must be commenced not later than two years after the conduct that gives rise to a claim for relief occurred.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 30.835",
      "topic": "Civil action time limit",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_voy",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.700: Covert intimate recording",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] ORS 163.700(1)(b): knowingly recording another person's intimate area without consent, where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, is invasion of personal privacy in the second degree.",
      "body": "ORS 163.700(1)(b): knowingly recording another person's intimate area without consent, where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, is invasion of personal privacy in the second degree.\n\nWhat Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes) actually says:\n\n“(b)(A) The person knowingly makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of another persons intimate area without the consent of the other person; and (B) The person being recorded has a reasonable expectation of privacy concerning the intimate area.”",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon Legislature (Oregon Revised Statutes)",
      "evidence_quote": "(b)(A) The person knowingly makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of another persons intimate area without the consent of the other person; and (B) The person being recorded has a reasonable expectation of privacy concerning the intimate area.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "ORS 163.700",
      "topic": "Covert intimate recording",
      "applies_to_country": "US",
      "applies_to_scope": "OR",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "setting_up",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "unclassified"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_ors_chapter_index",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: statutory code index",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon's statutes are published on the official Oregon Legislature site at oregonlegislature.gov under a page titled 'Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) - 2025 Edition' listing numbered chapters grouped by title.",
      "body": "Oregon's statutes are published on the official Oregon Legislature site at oregonlegislature.gov under a page titled 'Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) - 2025 Edition' listing numbered chapters grouped by title.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) - 2025 Edition The Oregon Revised Statutes are the codified laws.”\n\nNote: Anchor record. Opened https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/Pages/ORS.aspx on 2026-10-18. This is the official Oregon Legislature site for browsing the Oregon Revised Statutes.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/Pages/ORS.aspx",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) - 2025 Edition The Oregon Revised Statutes are the codified laws.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "statutory code index",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "applies_to_scope": "Anchor record",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "choosing",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.legal"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_criminal_dissemination_intimate_image",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: non-consensual intimate-image criminal statute",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon Revised Statute 163.472 makes it a crime to unlawfully disseminate an intimate image, defined as knowingly causing to be disclosed an image of another person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure, when the person knows or should know the subject does not consent, the subject is harassed humiliated or injured, and a reasonable person would be harassed humiliated or injured.",
      "body": "Oregon Revised Statute 163.472 makes it a crime to unlawfully disseminate an intimate image, defined as knowingly causing to be disclosed an image of another person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure, when the person knows or should know the subject does not consent, the subject is harassed humiliated or injured, and a reasonable person would be harassed humiliated or injured.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“163.472 Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image. (1) A person commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image if: (a) The person, with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly causes to be disclosed an image of the other person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct; (b) The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure. (3) As used in this section: (b) Image includes, but is not limited to, the following, regardless of the manner in which the image is stored: (A) A photograph, film, videotape, recording, digital picture or other visual reproduction. (B) A digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.”\n\nNote: ORS 163.472. The definition of 'image' explicitly includes a 'digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic,' so the statute extends to AI/deepfake imagery if it is realistically depicted. Elements: intent to harass/humiliate/injure, knowing disclosure, lack of consent, actual injury, and reasonable-person standard.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "163.472 Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image. (1) A person commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image if: (a) The person, with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly causes to be disclosed an image of the other person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct; (b) The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure. (3) As used in this section: (b) Image includes, but is not limited to, the following, regardless of the manner in which the image is stored: (A) A photograph, film, videotape, recording, digital picture or other visual reproduction. (B) A digitally created, manipulated or altered depiction that is reasonably realistic.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "non-consensual intimate-image criminal statute",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "applies_to_scope": "Covers only photographs only to extent such photographs depict an image whose intimate parts are visible or in which the",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "running",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "rules.content",
          "safety.legal"
        ],
        "explicitness": "explicit_solo"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_action_intimate_image",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: civil remedy for victims",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon Revised Statute 30.833 gives a person depicted in an image disclosed in violation of ORS 163.472 a civil action for an injunction, damages or other appropriate relief that is independent of any criminal prosecution, and a prevailing plaintiff may recover the greater of special and general damages including emotional distress or $5,000 statutory damages per plaintiff against each defendant found liable, plus the defendant's economic gain from the disclosure, plus punitive damages.",
      "body": "Oregon Revised Statute 30.833 gives a person depicted in an image disclosed in violation of ORS 163.472 a civil action for an injunction, damages or other appropriate relief that is independent of any criminal prosecution, and a prevailing plaintiff may recover the greater of special and general damages including emotional distress or $5,000 statutory damages per plaintiff against each defendant found liable, plus the defendant's economic gain from the disclosure, plus punitive damages.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“30.833 Action for dissemination of intimate image; attorney fees. (1) Irrespective of any criminal prosecution or the result thereof, a person depicted in an image disclosed in violation of ORS 163.472, or that person's parent or guardian, representative or estate, shall have a civil action to secure an injunction, damages or other appropriate relief against any and all persons whose actions are unlawful under ORS 163.472. (2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.833 provides a civil cause of action for non-consensual intimate image dissemination that operates irrespective of criminal prosecution. The civil action allows for injunctive relief, statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff per defendant, compensatory damages, economic gain recovery, and punitive damages, plus reasonable attorney fees under subsection (3).",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "30.833 Action for dissemination of intimate image; attorney fees. (1) Irrespective of any criminal prosecution or the result thereof, a person depicted in an image disclosed in violation of ORS 163.472, or that person's parent or guardian, representative or estate, shall have a civil action to secure an injunction, damages or other appropriate relief against any and all persons whose actions are unlawful under ORS 163.472. (2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "civil remedy for victims",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "money.payout",
          "rules.enforcement"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_invasion_privacy",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: civil cause of action for invasion of personal privacy",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon Revised Statute 30.831 grants a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy when a plaintiff establishes that a defendant knowingly made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity without consent while the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy, or viewed such images, or disseminated images knowing the plaintiff was in a private place.",
      "body": "Oregon Revised Statute 30.831 grants a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy when a plaintiff establishes that a defendant knowingly made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity without consent while the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy, or viewed such images, or disseminated images knowing the plaintiff was in a private place.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(1) A plaintiff has a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy if the plaintiff establishes any of the following: (a) The defendant knowingly made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity without the consent of the plaintiff, and at the time the visual recording was made or recorded the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy. (b) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the defendant, the defendant was in a location to observe the plaintiff in a state of nudity without the consent of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy. (c) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, the defendant knowingly: (A) Made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff; or (B) Viewed an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff. (d) Without the consent of the plaintiff, the defendant disseminated a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity, and the defendant knew that at the time the visual recording was made or recorded the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.831. This is Oregon's general civil invasion of privacy statute, separate from ORS 30.833 which specifically covers intimate image dissemination under ORS 163.472.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(1) A plaintiff has a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy if the plaintiff establishes any of the following: (a) The defendant knowingly made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity without the consent of the plaintiff, and at the time the visual recording was made or recorded the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy. (b) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the defendant, the defendant was in a location to observe the plaintiff in a state of nudity without the consent of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy. (c) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, the defendant knowingly: (A) Made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff; or (B) Viewed an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff. (d) Without the consent of the plaintiff, the defendant disseminated a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of the plaintiff in a state of nudity, and the defendant knew that at the time the visual recording was made or recorded the plaintiff was in a place and circumstances where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "civil cause of action for invasion of personal privacy",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.harm",
          "safety.privacy"
        ],
        "explicitness": "explicit_solo"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_invasion_damages",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: civil damages for invasion of privacy",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] A plaintiff who prevails in a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy under ORS 30.831 is entitled to receive compensatory damages and reasonable attorney fees, and the remedy is in addition to any other claim for relief available under other law of this state.",
      "body": "A plaintiff who prevails in a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy under ORS 30.831 is entitled to receive compensatory damages and reasonable attorney fees, and the remedy is in addition to any other claim for relief available under other law of this state.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(2) A plaintiff who prevails in a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy under this section is entitled to receive: (a) Compensatory damages; and (b) Reasonable attorney fees. (4) The remedy provided by this section is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other claim for relief that may be available to a plaintiff by reason of conduct of a defendant described in subsection (1) of this section.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.831(2) and (4)",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(2) A plaintiff who prevails in a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy under this section is entitled to receive: (a) Compensatory damages; and (b) Reasonable attorney fees. (4) The remedy provided by this section is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other claim for relief that may be available to a plaintiff by reason of conduct of a defendant described in subsection (1) of this section.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "civil damages for invasion of privacy",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "money.payout"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_statute_definitions_civil",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: definitions for civil invasion of privacy",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.831, 'intimate area' means undergarments that are being worn by a person covered by clothing and intended to be protected from being seen, or any covered genitals pubic area or female breasts below the point immediately above the top of the areola; 'nudity' means uncovered or less than opaquely covered genitals pubic area or female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.831, 'intimate area' means undergarments that are being worn by a person covered by clothing and intended to be protected from being seen, or any covered genitals pubic area or female breasts below the point immediately above the top of the areola; 'nudity' means uncovered or less than opaquely covered genitals pubic area or female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(6) Definitions: (a) 'Intimate area' means: (A) Undergarments that are being worn by a person, are covered by clothing and are intended to be protected from being seen; and (B) Any of the following that are covered by clothing and are intended to be protected from being seen: (i) Genitals; (ii) Pubic area; (iii) Female breasts below the point immediately above the top of the areola. (c) 'Nudity' means any part of the uncovered or less than opaquely covered: (A) Genitals; (B) Pubic area; or (C) Female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.831(6). These define key terms for the civil invasion of privacy claim.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(6) Definitions: (a) 'Intimate area' means: (A) Undergarments that are being worn by a person, are covered by clothing and are intended to be protected from being seen; and (B) Any of the following that are covered by clothing and are intended to be protected from being seen: (i) Genitals; (ii) Pubic area; (iii) Female breasts below the point immediately above the top of the areola. (c) 'Nudity' means any part of the uncovered or less than opaquely covered: (A) Genitals; (B) Pubic area; or (C) Female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "definitions for civil invasion of privacy",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "choosing",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.privacy"
        ],
        "explicitness": "explicit_solo"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_criminal_statute_limitations",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: statute of limitations for criminal prosecution",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 131.125, a prosecution for a Class A misdemeanor such as unlawful dissemination of an intimate image under ORS 163.472 must be commenced within two years after the commission of the crime, unless fraud or breach of fiduciary duty extends it, and no period of limitation may be extended by more than three years.",
      "body": "Under ORS 131.125, a prosecution for a Class A misdemeanor such as unlawful dissemination of an intimate image under ORS 163.472 must be commenced within two years after the commission of the crime, unless fraud or breach of fiduciary duty extends it, and no period of limitation may be extended by more than three years.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(8) Except as provided in subsection (9) of this section or as otherwise expressly provided by law, prosecutions for other offenses must be commenced within the following periods of limitations after their commission: (a) For any other felony, three years. (b) For any misdemeanor, two years. (c) For a violation, six months.”\n\nNote: ORS 131.125(8)(b). Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class A misdemeanor under ORS 163.472(2), so the 2-year misdemeanor statute of limitations applies.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors131.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(8) Except as provided in subsection (9) of this section or as otherwise expressly provided by law, prosecutions for other offenses must be commenced within the following periods of limitations after their commission: (a) For any other felony, three years. (b) For any misdemeanor, two years. (c) For a violation, six months.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "statute of limitations for criminal prosecution",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "applies_to_scope": "ORS 131.125(8)(b) sets 2-year limit for misdemeanors",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "running",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.legal"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_intimate_image_5000",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: statutory damages for intimate image civil action",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.833, a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image may recover statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable, or the greater of special and general damages including emotional distress.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.833, a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image may recover statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable, or the greater of special and general damages including emotional distress.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.835. The civil action under ORS 30.833 allows statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff per defendant, which is the maximum statutory amount available.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "statutory damages for intimate image civil action",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "money.payout"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "unverified",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "legal_fetch_over_cap"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_privacy_economic_gain",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: economic gain recovery in privacy civil action",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.833, a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image may recover an amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.833, a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image may recover an amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.833(2)(b)",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(2) Upon prevailing in such action, the plaintiff may recover: (a) The greater of: (A) Special and general damages, including damages for emotional distress; or (B) Statutory damages of $5,000 per plaintiff against each defendant found liable under this section; (b) An amount equal to any economic gain received by the defendant for the disclosure; and (c) Punitive damages.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "economic gain recovery in privacy civil action",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "running",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "money.payout"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_mandatory_takedown",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: mandatory takedown duty for websites",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] No mandatory takedown or removal duty for websites hosting non-consensual intimate images was found in the opened Oregon statutes.",
      "body": "No mandatory takedown or removal duty for websites hosting non-consensual intimate images was found in the opened Oregon statutes.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“N/A”\n\nNote: ORs 30.833 provides for injunctive relief as a civil remedy, but does not impose a mandatory takedown duty on websites or platforms. The criminal statute ORS 163.472 does not impose a duty on websites. No mandatory website takedown statute was found in ORS chapter 163, chapter 30, or any other Oregon statute opened during this research. This is a narrower claim than 'no such statute exists in this state' - I opened chapters 163 and 30 but did not exhaustively search all state code.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors163.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "STRONG PRACTICE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "N/A",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "mandatory takedown duty for websites",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "rules.content",
          "safety.legal"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "placeholder_quote_too_short",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_invasion_intimate_area",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: civil remedy for intimate area privacy violation",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.831, a plaintiff has a cause of action if a defendant knowingly made or recorded, viewed, or disseminated an image involving the plaintiff's intimate area without consent for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.831, a plaintiff has a cause of action if a defendant knowingly made or recorded, viewed, or disseminated an image involving the plaintiff's intimate area without consent for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(c) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, the defendant knowingly: (A) Made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff; or (B) Viewed an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.831(1)(c)",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(c) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, the defendant knowingly: (A) Made or recorded a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff; or (B) Viewed an intimate area of the plaintiff without the consent of the plaintiff.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "civil remedy for intimate area privacy violation",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.privacy",
          "rules.content"
        ],
        "explicitness": "explicit_solo"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_invasion_private_info_civil",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: civil remedy for improper disclosure of personal information",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon Revised Statute 30.835 creates a civil cause of action for improper disclosure of personal information when a defendant, with intent to stalk, harass or injure, knowingly causes personal information to be disclosed without consent, the plaintiff is stalked harassed or injured by the disclosure, and a reasonable person would be stalked harassed or injured.",
      "body": "Oregon Revised Statute 30.835 creates a civil cause of action for improper disclosure of personal information when a defendant, with intent to stalk, harass or injure, knowingly causes personal information to be disclosed without consent, the plaintiff is stalked harassed or injured by the disclosure, and a reasonable person would be stalked harassed or injured.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(2) A plaintiff has a cause of action for improper disclosure of private information if the plaintiff establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) The defendant, with the intent to stalk, harass or injure the plaintiff, knowingly caused personal information to be disclosed; (b) The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the plaintiff did not consent to the disclosure; (c) The plaintiff is stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.835",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(2) A plaintiff has a cause of action for improper disclosure of private information if the plaintiff establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) The defendant, with the intent to stalk, harass or injure the plaintiff, knowingly caused personal information to be disclosed; (b) The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the plaintiff did not consent to the disclosure; (c) The plaintiff is stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be stalked, harassed or injured by the disclosure.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "civil remedy for improper disclosure of personal information",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.harm",
          "safety.privacy"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_trespass_personal_info_def",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: definition of personal information under privacy statute",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.835, 'personal information' means the plaintiff's home address, personal email address, personal phone number or Social Security number, contact information for the plaintiff's employer, contact information for a family member of the plaintiff, photographs of the plaintiff's children, or identification of the school that the plaintiff's children attend.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.835, 'personal information' means the plaintiff's home address, personal email address, personal phone number or Social Security number, contact information for the plaintiff's employer, contact information for a family member of the plaintiff, photographs of the plaintiff's children, or identification of the school that the plaintiff's children attend.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(d) 'Personal information' means: (A) The plaintiff's home address, personal electronic mail address, personal phone number or Social Security number; (B) Contact information for the plaintiff's employer; (C) Contact information for a family member of the plaintiff; (D) Photographs of the plaintiff's children; or (E) Identification of the school that the plaintiff's children attend.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.835(1)(d)",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(d) 'Personal information' means: (A) The plaintiff's home address, personal electronic mail address, personal phone number or Social Security number; (B) Contact information for the plaintiff's employer; (C) Contact information for a family member of the plaintiff; (D) Photographs of the plaintiff's children; or (E) Identification of the school that the plaintiff's children attend.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "definition of personal information under privacy statute",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "running",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.privacy"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_intimate_image_attorney",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: attorney fees for intimate image civil action",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] Under ORS 30.833, the court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image.",
      "body": "Under ORS 30.833, the court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff in a civil action for dissemination of an intimate image.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“(3) The court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff in an action under this section.”\n\nNote: ORS 30.833(3)",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "VERIFIED RULE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "(3) The court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff in an action under this section.",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "attorney fees for intimate image civil action",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "trouble",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "money.fees"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "hollow_body",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "learn_r784_oregon_revenge_porn_and_deepfake_laws_or_civil_intimate_image_limitations",
      "category": "Safety",
      "title": "[Unverified - being checked] Oregon: statute of limitations for intimate image civil action",
      "summary": "[Unverified - being checked] No explicit statute of limitations was found in ORS 30.833 for the civil action for dissemination of an intimate image; the general two-year civil statute of limitation under ORS 12.050 likely applies.",
      "body": "No explicit statute of limitations was found in ORS 30.833 for the civil action for dissemination of an intimate image; the general two-year civil statute of limitation under ORS 12.050 likely applies.\n\nWhat Oregon State Legislature actually says:\n\n“N/A”\n\nNote: ORS 30.833 does not state its own statute of limitations. ORS 30.831(3) explicitly states a 2-year limit for invasion of privacy claims, but ORS 30.833 does not include a similar provision. The general civil limitation under ORS 12.050 is likely 2 years but was not verified by opening ORS 12.050.",
      "source_type": "official",
      "source_link": "https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors030.html",
      "last_verified": "2026-10-18",
      "reliability": "STRONG PRACTICE",
      "source_tier": "A",
      "source_publisher": "Oregon State Legislature",
      "evidence_quote": "N/A",
      "volatility": "low",
      "from_batch": "784-oregon-revenge-porn-and-deepfake-laws",
      "subject": "Oregon",
      "topic": "statute of limitations for intimate image civil action",
      "applies_to_country": "us-or",
      "tags": {
        "lane": "any",
        "stage": "running",
        "region": [
          "us-or"
        ],
        "platform": "any",
        "topic": [
          "safety.legal"
        ],
        "explicitness": "any"
      },
      "verification": {
        "status": "failed",
        "label": "Unverified - being checked",
        "reasons": [
          "placeholder_quote_too_short",
          "strong_label_on_weak_content"
        ],
        "checked_utc": "20261021-123916Z"
      }
    }
  ]
}